Preliminary Program
| 8:45 am |
Welcome |
| 9:00 am |
Keynote I: Boaz-Patt Shamir |
|
Keynote I |
| 9:50 am |
Yann Busnel |
|
Towards Connectivity Management, using Social Networking |
| 10:15 am |
Giuliano Mega |
|
Can Gossip Lead to Privacy? |
| 10:40 am |
Coffee Break |
|
|
| 11:00 am |
Keynote IV: Peter Triantafillou |
|
Keynote IV |
| 11:50 am |
Burkhard Englert |
|
Megaphone: Fault Tolerant, Scalable, and Trustworthy Peer-to-Peer Microblogging |
| 12:15 pm |
Antoine Boutet |
|
Which acquaintances through distributed social networks? |
| 12:40 pm |
Lunch |
|
|
| 2:30 pm |
Keynote III: Krishna Gummadi |
|
The Sociology of Sybils: Understanding the limits of Social Network-based Sybil Defenses |
| 3:20 pm |
Gilles Tredan |
|
Sharpening the Definition of Centrality |
| 3:45 pm |
Alessandra Sala |
|
Analyzing Large-Scale Social Networks from Data to Applications |
| 4:10 pm |
Break |
|
|
| 4:30 pm |
Keynote II: Sihem Amer-Yahia |
|
Social Content Distribution and Recommendation |
| 5:10 pm |
Daniele Quercia |
|
Social Recommendations from Mobility Data |
| 5:35 pm |
Davide Frey |
|
Social Market: the Power of Implicit and Explicit Social Networks |
| 6:00 pm |
Open Discussion |
|
|
| 6:30pm |
Debriefing |
|
|
Social Content Distribution and Recommendation
Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace dominate the social networking
landscape. As these networks grow in size, it is becoming more tedious
to keep up with the most relevant feeds, status updates and tweets,
amidst all the noise. Consequently, people are looking for more
focused places, referred to as vertical social networks, to connect
with like-minded individuals and obtain relevant content. In this
talk, I will discuss a distributed storage solution that leverages
shared user behavior to support a variety of search and recommendation
applications.
The Sociology of Sybils: Understanding the limits of Social Network-based Sybil Defenses
Avoiding multiple identity, or Sybil, attacks is known to be a
fundamental problem in the design of distributed systems. Recently,
there has been much excitement in the research community over using
social networks to detect Sybils and mitigate their attacks. A number
of schemes have been proposed, but they differ greatly in the
algorithms they use and in the networks upon which they are evaluated.
As a result, the research community lacks a clear understanding of how
these schemes compare against each other, how well they would work on
real-world social networks with different structural properties, or
whether there exist other (potentially better) ways of Sybil defense.
In this talk, I will first show that, despite their considerable
differences, existing Sybil defense schemes work by detecting {\it
local communities} (i.e., clusters of nodes more tightly knit than the
rest of the graph) around an a priori trusted node. The schemes would
consider the nodes contained in the communities to be honest
(trustworthy) and those outside to be potential Sybils. Next I will
leverage insights from sociology to show that real-world social
networks do not contain tightly knit community structures that are
larger than a certain size (typically, a few hundred nodes). Taken
together, these findings imply that, as online social networks grow to
include several millions of nodes, only a bounded number of
trustworthy nodes can be reliably identified by social network-based
Sybil defense schemes. I will conclude by discussing ways in which
future Sybil defense schemes can deal with users who are not included
in this small set of trusted nodes.